ReviewerOne vs Clarivate
Updated onCompare ReviewerOne and Clarivate side-by-side. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and target market.
ReviewerOne
AI-powered peer review management platform and community providing workflow tools, training resources, and recognition for scholarly reviewers, editors, and publishers.
Starts at $0
vs
Clarivate
Clarivate is a global information services and analytics company that provides enriched data, insights, and workflow solutions to support research, intellectual property management, and life sciences and healthcare innovation.
Which should you choose?
ReviewerOne
You prioritize a modern, AI-first, reviewer-centric peer review workflow with built-in training, recognition, and community features and are comfortable partnering with an emerging specialist platform like ReviewerOne.
Clarivate
You need a mature, enterprise-grade provider with a broad portfolio of research analytics, IP management, and established peer-review systems widely adopted by institutions and publishers, which points you to Clarivate.
Key differences
| Category | ReviewerOne | Clarivate | Why? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Scale & Maturity | Clarivate is a public company with more than 10,001 employees and long-standing data assets, while ReviewerOne is a newly incorporated private startup (founded in 2025) that is still in early-access mode. | ||
| Data, Analytics & Ecosystem Breadth | Clarivate combines peer-review tools like ScholarOne and Web of Science Reviewer Recognition with extensive citation databases, journal metrics, and IP and life-sciences datasets, whereas ReviewerOne currently concentrates on workflow, reviewer analytics, and training without comparable research or IP analytics offerings. | ||
| Focus & Positioning | ReviewerOne is narrowly focused on AI-assisted peer-review workflows, reviewer-facing tools, and community/learning, whereas Clarivate spans research analytics, IP services, life-sciences intelligence, and workflow software where peer review is one component of a much broader portfolio. | ||
| Reviewer Experience, Training & Community | ReviewerOne offers a dedicated reviewer workspace, free access for individual reviewers, a recognition hub, and structured training via a learning management module and Reviewer Academy, while Clarivate focuses more on recognizing reviews within Web of Science profiles than on delivering a full reviewer-centric training and community platform. | ||
| User Reviews & Market Validation | Clarivate’s products collectively receive about a 4.1/5 rating from 360 reviews on G2 across multiple product categories, while ReviewerOne is so new that it does not yet appear on major software review marketplaces. |
Feature comparison
| Feature | ReviewerOne | Clarivate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reviewer recognition & ORCID-integrated credit | ReviewerOne offers a recognition hub with verifiable reviews, ORCID integration, and credits or certificates, while Clarivate’s Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service records peer reviews within researcher profiles and connects them to a large journal and researcher community. | ||
| Enterprise implementation services and dedicated support | Clarivate pairs its workflow software with expert services, security teams, and structured implementation projects, whereas ReviewerOne’s public materials do not yet detail comparable enterprise implementation or professional services offerings. | ||
| IP management and patent/trademark workflows | Clarivate offers multiple IP lifecycle and practice-management products such as FoundationIP, Inprotech and IPfolio, while ReviewerOne is dedicated to scholarly peer review rather than intellectual property management. | ||
| Open peer review and transparency workflows | Clarivate has implemented scalable open peer review workflows through integrations between ScholarOne and Publons/Web of Science with publishers like Wiley, while ReviewerOne emphasizes fairness and transparency but does not yet publicly document a specific open peer review workflow module. | ||
| Research analytics & citation metrics | ReviewerOne focuses on workflow and reviewer-level analytics rather than providing citation databases or journal metrics, whereas Clarivate is known for Web of Science, Journal Citation Reports and related analytics platforms for evaluating research performance. | ||
| End-to-end journal submission & peer-review workflow | ReviewerOne provides reviewer and editorial workflows that integrate with external submission systems and a publisher API rather than replacing them, whereas Clarivate’s ScholarOne Manuscripts is itself a full-featured, configurable submission and peer-review management system used by thousands of journals. | ||
| Integration with multiple journal submission systems | ReviewerOne positions itself as submission-system-agnostic and is building integrations via a publisher API but notes that these connections are still being rolled out, while Clarivate’s Reviewer Recognition Service already has pre-built integrations with ScholarOne, Editorial Manager, eJournalPress, OJS, Manuscript Manager, ReView and other systems. | ||
| AI-assisted manuscript checks (plagiarism, data/image integrity, bias) | ReviewerOne highlights AI checks covering plagiarism, data and image forensics, and bias detection to support reviewers, while Clarivate’s ScholarOne focuses on similarity checking via tools like iThenticate and unusual activity alerts but does not promote as broad a set of AI quality checks. | ||
| Reviewer training & learning management | ReviewerOne includes a dedicated learning management module with onboarding, ethics and best-practice courses, and a Reviewer Academy, whereas Clarivate offers broader product and research training resources but does not market a reviewer-specific learning management system at the same depth. |
Review Consensus
Clarivate
"Across hundreds of G2 reviews, Clarivate’s products are reviewed positively overall (around 4.1/5), though buyers weigh strong functionality and data coverage against cost and complexity, and some product lines still lack independent reviews on other platforms. "
Based on 360 reviews
- ● Well-known Clarivate brands such as EndNote, Web of Science, and IPfolio cover key parts of the research and IP lifecycle under a single vendor.
- ● Broad coverage across research, IP, and reference-management workflows means many organizational needs can be met by one provider.
- ● Strong underlying data assets and citation indexing support discovery, evaluation, and portfolio analysis for academia, government, and corporate users.
- ● Total cost of ownership can be high for smaller institutions relative to lighter-weight or point-solution alternatives, according to themes on public review sites.
- ● The breadth and depth of some Clarivate tools create a learning curve and can feel complex for new or occasional users.
- ● User experience and satisfaction can vary between product lines, so organizations may need to evaluate each Clarivate product separately rather than assuming uniform quality.
Data as of 1/28/2026
Based on 0 reviews
- ● No customer reviews yet are listed for Clarivate in the IP Law Services category on this platform, so prospective buyers cannot rely on Gartner Peer Insights for sentiment.
- ● The lack of reviews on Gartner Peer Insights means there is limited independent enterprise feedback there compared with G2 for Clarivate’s IP services.
Data as of 1/28/2026
Stay Ahead
Don't just find competitors. Track them.
Auto-discover new competitors as they emerge. Get alerts when they change pricing, features, ads, or messaging.
Competitor Monitoring
For founders who'd rather build than manually track competitors.
Starts at
$39 /month
Start with a 14-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Stop checking competitor websites manually. Get alerts when something important happens.
Auto Competitor Discovery
New competitors detected automatically as they emerge. Never get blindsided.
Website Tracking
Pricing, features, messaging, and page changes monitored daily
News & Social Monitoring
News mentions, X posts, Reddit posts, and competitor announcements
SEO & Ads Intelligence
Keyword rankings, backlinks, and ad creatives (Google + Meta)
AI Signal Detection
Filters out noise, surfaces only what matters
Email & Slack Alerts
Daily digests delivered where your team already works