Mureka vs Udio
Updated onCompare Mureka and Udio side-by-side. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and target market.
Mureka
AI-first music creation platform and studio that turns text or reference prompts into complete, royalty-free songs (lyrics, composition, vocals, and stems).
Starts at $0
vs
Udio
Text-to-music AI that generates songs with vocals and stems, aimed at creators and studios with subscription tiers and API access.
Starts at $0
Which should you choose?
Mureka
you need long-form, royalty-free songs with clear commercial licensing, API access, and flexible inputs (lyrics, humming, reference tracks) and are fine with song-based quotas instead of credits.
Udio
you prioritize top-tier vocal realism, powerful in-browser editing/remix tools, and a built-in creator community, and you’re comfortable with a credit-based system and evolving label-driven licensing terms.
Typical cost comparison
Scenario: Solo creator on the main mid-tier plan, billed annually.
Mureka
$96 per year
Udio
$96 per year
Both are equally priced in this scenario
Key differences
| Category | Mureka | Udio | Why? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developer & B2B Integrations | Mureka offers a dedicated API platform and monetization marketplace aimed at developers and businesses, whereas Udio is primarily a closed consumer product without a widely documented public API. | ||
| Editing Workflow & Community | Udio combines rich editing tools (extend, remix, inpainting, lyric timing) with a social feed and public profiles, while Mureka focuses more on generation and pro workflows with less emphasis on community discovery. | ||
| Licensing & Rights Clarity | Mureka heavily markets its output as 100% royalty-free and commercially usable on all plans (with some reviews flagging a non-commercial trial), while Udio’s rights and exports vary by tier and are intertwined with ongoing label licensing deals. | ||
| Pricing & Value per Song | Both start around $10/month, but Udio’s high monthly credit allowance typically yields more full-length generations per dollar than Mureka’s Basic plan cap of ~400 songs/month. | ||
| Song Length & Structural Control | Mureka’s newer models can generate coherent songs up to about five minutes in a single pass, whereas Udio typically produces clips up to ~130 seconds that must be extended and stitched for longer tracks. |
Feature comparison
| Feature | Mureka | Udio | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced region editing / inpainting | Both support regenerating parts of a track, but Udio’s browser UI heavily emphasizes extend, remix, and inpainting tools, while Mureka’s advanced editor is more production-oriented. | ||
| AI lyric generation & editor | Mureka can auto-generate and optimize lyrics, while Udio offers a custom lyrics editor with AI ‘write for me’ and timing controls. | ||
| Mobile apps (official) | Mureka is available on the web and as at least an Android app, with reviewers also noting broader mobile access; Udio runs on the web and has an official iOS app. },{ | ||
| Text-to-song with vocals | Both turn text prompts and/or lyrics into complete songs with vocals and instrumentation in a few clicks. | ||
| Built-in monetization/marketplace | Mureka includes copyright trading and a music marketplace so creators can sell AI-generated tracks, whereas Udio focuses on sharing and leaves monetization to external platforms. | ||
| Developer API | Mureka exposes an API platform for text-to-music and related services; Udio does not prominently advertise a comparable public API as of early 2026. | ||
| Humming/melody-to-song input | Mureka has a dedicated Melody Ideas/recording workflow that turns motifs into full songs, while Udio relies on uploading audio clips (Standard/Pro) which you then extend or remix. | ||
| Reference track / style matching | Mureka explicitly supports reference tracks and even YouTube links for style-controlled generation; Udio can be steered via prompts and audio uploads but is less focused on formal style-transfer workflows. | ||
| Royalty-free commercial use | Mureka markets all outputs as royalty-free and commercially usable (though at least one review flags the initial free trial as non-commercial), whereas Udio’s paid plans permit typical commercial use but the free tier and label deals require extra care. | ||
| Single-pass full-length song (≈3–5 minutes) | Mureka’s newer models generate songs up to about five minutes in one go; Udio typically caps each generation at ~130 seconds, requiring multiple extensions for longer pieces. | ||
| WAV & stem downloads | Mureka’s paid plans unlock WAV, instrumental, and stem exports, while Udio offers WAV/stems on paid tiers but has temporarily disabled most exports during its label licensing transition. | ||
| Social feed & creator community | Udio offers a song feed, public profiles, and social sharing; Mureka has playlists and discovery elements but is less centered on a public community layer. |
Review Consensus
Mureka
"Across app stores and review sites, Mureka is rated very highly for fast, customizable, royalty-free song creation, with most criticism focused on plan limits, genre coverage, and some language quirks."
Based on 47,000 reviews
- ● Very high average rating from tens of thousands of Android users, indicating strong satisfaction with music quality and ease of use.
- ● Users praise how quickly they can create complete songs across multiple genres without musical training.
- ● Mobile access plus web platform lets creators work on songs anywhere.
- ● Many reviewers complain that downloading full songs or higher-quality files requires a paid subscription despite the app being free to install.
- ● Some users note missing or limited genre options compared to what they expect (for example certain country or oldies styles).
- ● Occasional reports mention confusion around plan limits and what is included in free vs. paid tiers.
Data as of 1/4/2026
- ● Reviews emphasize Mureka’s ability to generate full-length, studio-like songs using advanced models such as Mureka 01 and V7.5.
- ● Strong marks for customization: users can adjust vocals, genre, mood, and structure and even clone voices on higher tiers.
- ● Writers highlight support for multiple languages and reference-track workflows as major differentiators.
- ● Reviewers note that pronunciation and lyric handling can still be uneven in some languages.
- ● Some advanced options (like video download and voice-to-singer features) are locked to higher-priced plans.
- ● The learning curve for advanced creation modes can feel steep for absolute beginners.
Data as of 5/26/2025
Based on 6,900 reviews
- ● Aggregated sentiment describes Mureka as a powerful yet simple way to turn ideas into songs quickly.
- ● Many users value the ability to generate similar songs from a reference track or motif with commercial rights.
- ● Positive comments frequently mention that the app solves producer and arrangement bottlenecks for non-pro musicians.
- ● Despite the high star rating, the site’s safety and legitimacy scores are relatively low, reflecting worries about billing or data practices.
- ● A subset of users complain that results can feel constrained to certain popular genres.
- ● Some reviewers are frustrated that there is no more generous permanently free tier with downloads.
Data as of 11/4/2025
Udio
"Reviews portray Udio as one of the highest-quality, most feature-rich AI music generators available, with main drawbacks around credit-based limits, short default song length, and evolving licensing/export constraints."
Based on 1,300 reviews
- ● Users consistently praise how easy it is to turn prompts into polished songs with vocals directly from their phones.
- ● The app’s integration with the web version and cross-device library is valued by mobile-first creators.
- ● Many reviews highlight studio-like sound quality relative to the simplicity of the interface.
- ● Several users mention that advanced editing features and higher-quality exports require paying for Standard or Pro.
- ● A few reviews complain about limitations around track length and having to chain extensions for longer songs.
- ● Some users are confused by the credit system and how many songs they can actually generate per month.
Data as of 1/11/2026
- ● The reviewer calls Udio a sophisticated, powerful AI music service with a generous free plan.
- ● Audio and production quality are described as industry-leading among consumer AI music tools.
- ● The article praises Udio’s flexibility across many genres and use cases.
- ● Tom’s Guide notes that deeper track customization can be complex for new users.
- ● The review flags that moderation and policy enforcement are still evolving.
- ● It also points out that reliance on credits can make planning large projects tricky.
Data as of 8/1/2024
- ● Reviewers highlight Udio’s strong text-to-music quality and ease of turning prompts into songs with vocals.
- ● They appreciate tools like the lyrics editor, stem splitter, remixer, and extender in one suite.
- ● Mobile customization and multi-genre support are frequently cited positives.
- ● Articles note that songs are relatively short by default and need extensions for album-length material.
- ● Some features and export formats are only unlocked on paid plans, limiting heavy use on free.
- ● They also mention that while commercial use is allowed on paid plans, the evolving licensing landscape means users must monitor terms.
Data as of 5/21/2025
- ● AIChief rates Udio highly for feature depth, especially stem downloads and advanced editing controls.
- ● The review stresses that Udio’s AI captures mood and genre well for both songs and instrumentals.
- ● It positions Udio as suitable for musicians, content creators, and marketers alike.
- ● The article notes that advanced users may still want more granular control over musical elements.
- ● It points out that Udio’s training data and copyright implications remain a concern for some.
- ● Reliance on a credit-based model can feel restrictive for very high-volume workflows.
Data as of 11/26/2025
Stay Ahead
Don't just find competitors. Track them.
Auto-discover new competitors as they emerge. Get alerts when they change pricing, features, ads, or messaging.
Competitor Monitoring
For founders who'd rather build than manually track competitors.
Starts at
$39 /month
Start with a 14-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Stop checking competitor websites manually. Get alerts when something important happens.
Auto Competitor Discovery
New competitors detected automatically as they emerge. Never get blindsided.
Website Tracking
Pricing, features, messaging, and page changes monitored daily
News & Social Monitoring
News mentions, X posts, Reddit posts, and competitor announcements
SEO & Ads Intelligence
Keyword rankings, backlinks, and ad creatives (Google + Meta)
AI Signal Detection
Filters out noise, surfaces only what matters
Email & Slack Alerts
Daily digests delivered where your team already works