Direct, indirect, and alternative competitors of posthog.com
| Competitor | Type | Rationale | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Amplitude is a leading product and digital analytics platform offering event-based analytics, web analytics, session replay, and experimentation to product teams, directly overlapping with PostHog's analytics and testing capabilities for similar SaaS and digital businesses. | ||
| Direct | Mixpanel is an event-based product analytics platform with funnels, cohort analysis, and experimentation for product, growth, and engineering teams, competing directly with PostHog for self-serve product analytics and behavioral insights. | ||
| Direct | Heap provides auto-capture product and web analytics with journey maps, funnels, and integrated session replay, making it a direct alternative to PostHog for teams wanting comprehensive behavioral analytics without heavy upfront event instrumentation. | ||
| Direct | Pendo combines product analytics, in-app guides, feedback, and session replay to help software companies understand and drive product adoption, overlapping strongly with PostHog’s analytics and in-app feedback use cases for SaaS and enterprise teams. | ||
| Indirect | LaunchDarkly is a leading feature management platform focused on feature flags and experimentation for development teams, competing with the feature flagging and A/B testing parts of PostHog used to de-risk releases and control rollouts. | ||
| Indirect | FullStory is a behavioral data and digital experience analytics platform offering automatic data capture, session replay, and funnel analysis to optimize web and app experiences, overlapping with PostHog’s session replay and behavior analytics for product and UX teams. | ||
| Indirect | Hotjar, now part of Contentsquare, provides heatmaps, session recordings, funnels, and on-site surveys to understand website user behavior, competing with PostHog’s replay and survey capabilities for smaller to mid-market teams focused on UX and conversion optimization. | ||
| Indirect | Matomo is a widely used open-source web and app analytics platform that supports self-hosting, heatmaps, session recording, and A/B testing, appealing to the same privacy- and data-ownership-focused organizations that might otherwise choose PostHog’s open-source analytics. | ||
| Indirect | Plausible is a lightweight, open-source, privacy-first web analytics service popular with startups and indie businesses, overlapping with PostHog for teams that want simple, self-hostable analytics instead of a full product analytics and feature management suite. |
How competitors of posthog.com position themselves
| Competitor | Tagline | Promise | ICP | Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
"The AI analytics platform for testing everything" | See everything that customers do, understand what drives growth, and accelerate business outcomes—all in one AI-native platform. | Product, marketing, engineering, and data teams building digital products and customer experiences. | AI-native suite combining analytics, experimentation, activation, and governance—plus AI Agents and natural-language answers (“just ask”). | |
"Analytics that drive decisions. " | Turn user behavior insights into clear next steps, without delays or SQL bottlenecks. | Product, engineering, marketing, and data teams building digital (web/mobile) experiences—especially enterprise teams. | Self-serve, AI-powered “data clarity” with Metric Trees, governance, and a unified view across analytics workflows. | |
"Better Insights. Faster. " | Complete understanding of customers’ digital journeys so teams quickly improve conversion, retention, and customer delight. | Product, growth, and marketing teams at SaaS and digital businesses improving acquisition, activation, retention, and expansion. | Only “digital insights platform” with automatic, complete data capture via single snippet—no engineering—plus data science and session replay. | |
"Understand and guide users. Then prove impact." | Analytics and adoption platform to enhance software experiences and prove business impact. | Customer success, product, and app teams at startups to Fortune 500 building customer and employee software. | All-in-one platform unifying analytics, in-app guidance, and feedback, powered by AI and massive product usage dataset. | |
"Where features and AI control start." | Ship with confidence: combine feature flags, experimentation, observability, analytics, and AI configuration to de-risk releases. | Software developers and DevOps/product teams at enterprise scale shipping digital products and AI applications in production. | Unified feature management plus experimentation, observability, and AI controls, delivered via 35+ SDKs and 80+ integrations. | |
"Better data. Better digital experiences. " | Build better digital experiences with insights from always-on AI-agent analysts and behavioral data. | Teams improving web/mobile journeys across industries (e.g., retail, SaaS, fintech, travel, gaming). | Fullcapture + built-in StoryAI provides context-rich answers from complete, tagless autocaptured behavioral data. | |
"Hotjar has evolved into something more powerful. " | Go from insight to impact, fast—understand and improve your website or app. | Product, UX, and marketing teams improving websites/apps with behavior analytics, feedback, and user research needs. | Now part of Contentsquare: connected platform unifying heatmaps, session replay, funnels, surveys, feedback, and product analytics. | |
"Web & app analytics for teams who demand accuracy. " | Track 100% of available traffic with confidence—privacy-first analytics with full data ownership. | Businesses and organisations that need accurate web/app analytics and strong privacy compliance (GDPR/CCPA). | No data sampling; open-source; self-host or cloud—100% data ownership and potentially no consent forms needed. |
Who competitors of posthog.com target and what problems they solve
Product features extracted from competitors of posthog.com
| Competitor | Feature | Category | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Amplitude 29
features | AI Agents | Specialized, goal‑oriented AI experts embedded in Amplitude that can surface insights, investigate issues, generate hypotheses, recommend actions, and carry out actions you approve (e.g., run an experiment or send targeted guidance). | |
| Dashboard Agent | Automatically analyzes an Amplitude dashboard to produce prioritized insights and recommendations, including patterns/anomalies and root-cause deep dives, with optional scheduled notifications to Slack/email. | ||
| MCP Server | Amplitude Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets you query and create Amplitude content (charts, dashboards, experiments, cohorts) from MCP-compatible AI tools using natural language. | ||
| Ask Amplitude | Conversational interface that lets you create/edit charts from natural language, search org content (charts/dashboards), navigate Amplitude, and get help using the product. | ||
| Autocapture | Automatically captures a predefined set of website/app interactions with minimal setup (e.g., sessions, page views, clicks, form interactions, file downloads, and marketing attribution). | ||
| Visual labeling | Create and edit labeled events with no new code by clicking elements on your site; labeled events can work retroactively against historical Autocapture data. | ||
| Amplitude Govern | Codeless data governance for planning events/properties with automated event-schema QA, sensitive-data ingestion rules, and instant schema fixes (e.g., naming conventions/duplicates) without changing underlying data. | ||
| Data Mutability | Keeps Amplitude aligned with your warehouse by supporting INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operations on event data via Mirror Sync strategies (e.g., Snowflake/Databricks/S3). | ||
| Warehouse-native analytics | Run analyses directly on data in your own data warehouse (Warehouse-native Amplitude), including building custom analyses from data models that live in the warehouse. | ||
| Profiles | Join customer profile data from your warehouse as “standalone” (eventless) user profile properties that stay synced with the latest warehouse values. | ||
| Role-based access control | Role-based Access Controls (RBAC) to centrally manage roles/permissions/actions so administrators can scale access management across products and projects. | ||
| Data Access Control | Restrict access to sensitive data categories (e.g., PII/revenue data) so unauthorized users can’t view or build analyses that include restricted properties, and restricted values appear as "[DAC Restricted]". | ||
| Integrations directory | Catalog of data & marketing integrations covering sources/destinations and multiple connection types (e.g., raw events, cohorts, event streaming, SDKs, and APIs). | ||
| Data Connections | Unify customer data across your ecosystem as part of Amplitude Activation (connect product + marketing + warehouse data to power activation). | ||
| Identity resolution | Resolve customer identities across touchpoints to build unified customer profiles for analysis and targeting. | ||
Mixpanel 30
features | Insights report | Visualize trends and compositions in event/cohort/profile data with multiple chart types; includes advanced capabilities like formulas, comparisons, and generating custom events/properties. | |
| Funnels report | Analyze multi-step conversion journeys, measure conversion rate/time-to-convert, and pinpoint where users drop off in key flows. | ||
| Retention report | Measure how users return after an entry action to quantify retention and loyalty across cohorts over time. | ||
| Flows report | Explore how users move through your product by analyzing paths/behavior sequences to understand common journeys. | ||
| Signal correlation analysis | Quantifies correlation between a “goal event” and other events to identify behaviors associated with higher retention/conversion. | ||
| Impact report | Measures the effects of product/marketing launches on KPIs by comparing adopters vs non-adopters and tracking adoption over time. | ||
| Session Replay | Watch playbacks to understand the “why” behind drop-offs, filter replays using Mixpanel events/properties/cohorts, and use replays across web + mobile apps (and even tied to backend/warehouse events). | ||
| Heatmaps | Visualize hot spots, dead zones, and missed opportunities on web pages, connected to analytics and replays in the same workflow. | ||
| Replay privacy controls | Privacy-first Session Replay with client-side masking/blocking (so raw sensitive data isn’t collected) plus configurable controls for what to unmask/unblock. | ||
| Autocapture | Web autocapture to collect common frontend interactions with minimal setup (page views, clicks, form interactions, scrolls) plus attribution and frustration signals like dead clicks and rage clicks. | ||
| Data Warehouse Connectors | Codeless syncing of warehouse data (e.g., Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, Redshift, Postgres) into Mixpanel so teams can analyze product + business data together. | ||
| Mirror Mode sync | Keeps Mixpanel in sync with warehouse changes, including reflecting updates to historical records when events are modified or deleted in the warehouse. | ||
| Borrowed Properties | Hybrid data capability to apply clickstream context (like UTMs) onto warehouse events (like confirmed signups) without engineering lift. | ||
| Data Pipelines export | Continuously export Mixpanel data (events, user profiles, identity mappings) to cloud storage buckets or data warehouses for SQL analysis in your environment. | ||
| Cohorts builder | Visually define cohorts from behavior sequences and/or profile properties, compare them in analysis, and manage cohorts alongside other saved definitions. | ||
Heap 30
features | Autocapture (single snippet) | Automatically captures user interactions from install onward (e.g., clicks/taps/swipes/pageviews/form fills) so teams don’t need to pre-plan tracking or rely on engineers for instrumentation. | |
| Retroactive dataset | Because Heap captures from day one, teams can answer new questions on historical data without waiting for new instrumentation/data to collect. | ||
| Mobile Smart Capture | Smart Capture for mobile apps (no tagging) with broad framework support (native + cross-platform) to collect mobile behavioral data quickly with less code and maintenance. | ||
| Hybrid capture strategy | Supports combining Smart Capture/Autocapture with manual tracking and server-side events to match different teams’ workflows and data needs. | ||
| Server-side Track API | Server-side API to send custom events (e.g., purchases, backend milestones) with support for idempotency keys to prevent duplicate events. | ||
| Custom events (client vs server) | Guidance and support for capturing additional user activities as custom events via client-side and server-side track APIs, including tradeoffs (e.g., ad blockers vs precision). | ||
| Event Visualizer (point-and-click) | Point-and-click interface to find, name, and manage events without touching the codebase (including applying labels to raw events). | ||
| Retroactive event definitions | Event definitions apply across the entire dataset so newly defined events can be analyzed immediately across historical data. | ||
| Snapshots (no-code enrichment) | Inject metadata into Autocaptured events without code (e.g., capture form-fill fields, grab text from elements, attach custom JavaScript-derived values as event properties). | ||
| Enrichment APIs & identity modeling | Use APIs to enrich user/account/event properties, create unique identities across sessions, and incorporate server-side details (e.g., purchase processing and what was bought). | ||
| Governance lifecycle workflow | Built-in governance lifecycle for events: Define (taxonomy), Validate (verification), Monitor (alerts/repair), and Evolve (update/retire/combine). | ||
| Data Dictionary + versioning | Provides a Data Dictionary/definitions hub plus categories and version history to keep large datasets consistent and understandable. | ||
| Automated governance monitoring | Governance tooling surfaces items needing attention (e.g., notifies admins when new events need verification and flags definitions that stop collecting data). | ||
| Heap Illuminate (data science layer) | Data science layer that analyzes behavioral data to automatically surface insights—even on behaviors you haven’t been following. | ||
| Top Events (conversion drivers) | Generates a “Top Events” table to show key events between two moments in a funnel and what most influences conversion. | ||
Pendo 30
features | No-tagging analytics | Instantly tracks engagement and success drivers for product analytics with “no manual event tagging needed.” | |
| Retroactive analytics | Lets teams “start yesterday” by learning from the past with retroactive product analytics. | ||
| AI next-step recommendations | Surfaces AI-powered recommendations (recommended next steps) so teams can act on insights faster. | ||
| Journey drop-off insights | Tracks and compares how users navigate your app to spot drop-off and improve conversion. | ||
| Unified web + product analytics | Unifies web and product analytics to understand which campaigns bring highly engaged users. | ||
| No-code guide builder | Deploy in-app guidance quickly using a no-engineering approach (“no engineering required”) with Pendo’s guide creation experience. | ||
| Embedded in-app guides | Uses embedded guides that blend into your UI for contextual help without disrupting the experience. | ||
| Walkthroughs & tooltips | Supports walkthroughs and tooltips that surface when needed to accelerate onboarding and feature adoption. | ||
| Guide Branching | Builds dynamic in-app experiences with conditional logic (“Guide Branching”) that adapts to each user’s choices. | ||
| AI guide creation | Creates guides instantly using simple prompts via the AI guide builder (open beta). | ||
| Guides Dark Mode | Automatically matches your app’s dark mode so guides stay seamless and on-brand. | ||
| Web + mobile replay | Provides video playbacks of user sessions for web and mobile apps to see experiences firsthand. | ||
| Unlimited replay library | Includes unlimited replays, plus filtering and “Suggested Replays” to focus on the most relevant sessions. | ||
| Replay privacy controls | Offers no-code privacy settings; sensitive content can be masked/blocked on the client so it never leaves the visitor’s device. | ||
| Replay developer logs | Debug faster with console and network logs in Session Replay, and report bugs with AI. | ||
FullStory 30
features | Fullcapture™ autocapture | Automatically captures every user interaction without manual tagging, so teams can explore fresh insights retroactively and avoid missed data points. | |
| Server-side data processing | Uses a “one global script” approach with server-side data processing to minimize client-side load and avoid performance hiccups. | ||
| Auto-adjusting capture | Fullcapture adjusts to changes in your site or app automatically, reducing the need to retag or update events over time. | ||
| High-fidelity Session Replay | Recreates user sessions so teams can see the “why” behind metrics, including support for behaviors like tabbed browsing. | ||
| StoryAI session summaries | Generates AI-powered session summaries (including multi-session summaries) to condense lengthy replays into actionable takeaways. | ||
| Ask StoryAI | An AI-powered analyst built into Fullstory that answers questions and analyzes sessions, segments, and dashboards to surface context-rich insights. | ||
| StoryAI Opportunities | Proactively identifies and prioritizes issues such as “Opportunities - Funnel Drops” and “Opportunities - Spiking Issues,” based on impact. | ||
| Selector optimization | AI assistance that trims selectors down to the most stable option for elements (to make analysis and definition work more resilient). | ||
| Suggested pages & elements | AI suggests pages that match behavioral patterns and recommends elements/object names to speed up configuration and analysis. | ||
| Heatmaps (Click & Scroll Maps) | Visualize engagement with Click Maps and Scroll Maps to understand interaction and scroll depth on pages; jump to deeper diagnostics as needed. | ||
| Funnels & Conversions | Analyze conversion paths to spot where users get off track, measure completion and speed-to-finish, and save high-priority funnels to dashboards. | ||
| Frustration signals detection | Automatically surfaces key frustration signals such as Rage Clicks, Dead Clicks, Error Clicks, and Thrashed Cursor to pinpoint UX breakdowns. | ||
| Sentiment Signals alerts | Provides automated alerts for frustration/sentiment signals and prioritizes issues by business impact, with validation via Session Replay. | ||
| Journeys (journey mapping) | Visualize step-by-step navigation paths through your site to understand common routes and deviations by segment, using Pages, Events, and Elements. | ||
| User Segments | Create segments from hundreds of user and event criteria (and enriched attributes) to compare successful vs. struggling cohorts across analyses. | ||
Hotjar 30
features | Click/scroll/move Heatmaps | Visualize aggregated behavior to see where users click (or tap), scroll, and move on each page—so you can identify what’s working (and what’s not). | |
| Attention Maps | Heatmaps include “Attention Maps” to help you understand what grabs users’ attention. | ||
| Side-by-side comparisons | Compare behaviors “side by side across journeys” to spot differences and patterns faster. | ||
| Session Replay | Watch real user journeys to quickly spot bugs, confusion, and drop-offs. | ||
| AI replay summaries | Get AI-powered summaries (including a “one-click summary”) that highlight key moments so you can find issues faster. | ||
| Frustration detection | Session Replay includes frustration detection to help surface sessions worth investigating. | ||
| Error detection | Session Replay is described as enhanced with error detection to help teams find and fix bugs faster. | ||
| Privacy-first recording | Hotjar highlights a “privacy-first script built for site speed,” and its recording pipeline includes anonymization/suppression controls you manage. | ||
| Connected insights | Connect replays with heatmaps and survey responses to get the “full picture” of what users experience. | ||
| Drop-off Funnels | Visualize each step of a journey to see where users drop off and connect the numbers to behavior. | ||
| Flexible funnel steps | Build funnels with up to 10 steps based on sessions that viewed a page, clicked an element, or triggered an event—and jump into connected recordings for conversions/drop-offs. | ||
| Funnel comparisons | Compare funnels across devices/segments with up to 5 comparisons, plus views like “Conversion over time” and “average time to convert.” | ||
| Sense Chat insights | Use “Sense Chat” to ask questions (e.g., where users are dropping off) and get practical recommendations instantly. | ||
| Trends custom metrics | Create and compare custom metrics, visualize them in charts, track over time, click through to related recordings/heatmaps, and add them to Dashboards. | ||
| Dashboards overview | Dashboards provide a high-level view of key metrics; you can filter and compare aggregates and reuse saved “Segments” across Recordings and Dashboards. | ||
Matomo 30
features | 100% data ownership | Matomo is built around “100% data ownership”, so you stay in full control of your analytics data. | |
| Open-source analytics | Matomo is free and open-source software (GPL v3 or later), designed for transparency, extensibility, and long-term “future-proof” analytics. | ||
| No data sampling | Matomo emphasizes “No Data Sampling” so reporting is based on complete, unsampled data rather than estimates. | ||
| No data limitations | Matomo highlights “No data limitations” (e.g., no limits on websites/users/segments and no limitation on how much data you store). | ||
| Cloud-hosted Matomo | Matomo Cloud is a fully managed option with access to all Matomo features plus automatic software updates and support. | ||
| Self-hosted On-Premise | Matomo On-Premise lets you self-host Matomo Analytics on your own servers to control where your data is stored (data sovereignty). | ||
| Cloud↔On-Premise migration | Matomo supports migrating between Cloud-hosted and On-Premise (and vice versa). | ||
| Data Warehouse Connector | The Data Warehouse Connector is a Matomo Cloud add-on for hosted, automated exports of Matomo analytics data to supported data warehouse platforms (e.g., BigQuery workflows are documented). | ||
| Google Analytics Importer | Matomo provides a Google Analytics import to bring historical GA reports/data into Matomo. | ||
| Log Analytics (server logs) | Matomo Log Analytics lets you generate reports by importing web server logs as an alternative to JavaScript tracking (for more security/privacy-sensitive environments). | ||
| GDPR Manager | Matomo positions “GDPR Manager” alongside GDPR features like data anonymization, opt-out, and visitor data deletion capabilities. | ||
| Privacy protections suite | Matomo lists privacy controls such as IP anonymisation, DoNotTrack support, an opt-out mechanism, configurable retention, and the ability to run in consent-exempt configurations (when properly configured). | ||
| Consent & cookie controls | Matomo supports tracking/cookie consent modes (e.g., requireConsent vs requireCookieConsent) and can also be configured for cookieless tracking (disable cookies). | ||
| Consent Manager integrations | Matomo provides guidance and integrations for Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) so analytics collection can be aligned to user consent. | ||
| User opt-out form | Matomo includes built-in opt-out mechanisms, including an embeddable opt-out form you can publish (often on a privacy policy page). |
Features that 50%+ of competitors of posthog.com offer. These are baseline buyer expectations.
Table-stakes features
Features 50%+ of competitors have
You're missing
Add these to your roadmap
Integrations & connectors
Integrations
Unique features that only 1-2 competitors of posthog.com offer. These are potential competitive advantages.
Differentiator features
Unique to 1-2 entities only
Your differentiators
Features that set you apart
SQL / query language
DevTools
Notebooks
Collab
Chart annotations
Reporting
User testing
Research
Tag manager
Tagging
Self-hosted open-source
Deployment
SSO / SAML
Security
Role-based access control
Admin
Predictive churn/upsell
Predictive
Roadmaps
Roadmaps
Error & console capture
Observability
How competitors of posthog.com price their products
Normalized monthly pricing for competitors of posthog.com
| Competitor | Plan | Original Price | Monthly Equivalent | Calculation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Free | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Growth | $0 | $0/mo | Already monthly | |
| Growth | $0 | $0/mo | Annual ÷ 12 | |
| Startup Plan (Mixpanel for Startups program) | $0 | $0/mo | Annual ÷ 12 | |
| Free | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Pendo Free | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Agent Analytics for Free | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Developer | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| FullstoryFree | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Free | $0 | $0/mo | Free tier | |
| Growth | $480 | $40/mo | Annual ÷ 12 | |
| Plus | $582 | $48.5/mo | Annual ÷ 12 | |
| Plus | $49 | $49/mo | Already monthly | |
| Growth | $49 | $49/mo | Already monthly | |
| MTU billing (sales-led option) | $20,000 | $1,666.67/mo | Annual ÷ 12 |
How competitors of posthog.com are rated on G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot
| Competitor | G2 | Capterra | Trustpilot |
|---|---|---|---|
4.5/5 2,675 reviews | 4.6/5 67 reviews | 1.8/5 45 reviews | |
4.6/5 1,261 reviews | 4.5/5 144 reviews | 2.3/5 7 reviews | |
4.4/5 1,096 reviews | 4.5/5 42 reviews | Not listed | |
4.4/5 1,559 reviews | 4.5/5 238 reviews | 3.2/5 2 reviews | |
4.5/5 648 reviews | 4.7/5 24 reviews | 3.6/5 2 reviews | |
4.5/5 851 reviews | 4.6/5 67 reviews | 2.6/5 4 reviews | |
4.3/5 331 reviews | 4.6/5 538 reviews | 1.9/5 54 reviews | |
4.8/5 3 reviews | 4.6/5 8 reviews | 3.8/5 3 reviews |
What customers love and hate about competitors of posthog.com
| Competitor | What Customers Love | Common Complaints |
|---|---|---|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Actionable competitor weaknesses with positioning suggestions for posthog.com
Frequently viewed as expensive relative to alternatives (especially at higher tiers).
"It is the gold standard in this category but comes along with the price tag to support those claims."
— TrustRadius
"AA is better: Pricing tiers (events vs # of users) ... cost ..."
— TrustRadius
Lead with a clear, predictable pricing model (and an ROI calculator). Emphasize lower total cost at scale (events + seats), plus easier tier upgrades without sharp jumps.
Advanced analysis/reporting flexibility gaps (SQL access, custom binning, and time-range presets).
"I wish you could query against data uploaded in Amplitude with sql."
— G2
"No option for custom binning numeric columns."
— G2
Position a more flexible analysis layer: built-in SQL/notebook mode, richer time controls (MTD/WTD), and stronger customization (bins, formulas, and reusable metrics).
Reporting and setup can feel complex; some users cite slow performance and documentation friction.
"Creating custom reports was complicated and the interface wasn't particularly user-friendly."
— Capterra
"The documentation has a history of misleading developers in my company."
— G2
Differentiate on faster time-to-value: guided setup, opinionated templates, stable UI patterns, and “instrumentation-first” workflows (event QA, schema governance, and better onboarding/support).
Perceived as expensive/rigid (bundle pricing; value concerns vs cheaper/free options).
"Rigid pricing. You have to pay for the whole suite even if you only use a fraction of the offerings."
— G2
"Not convinced it provides enough value over a free analytics provider to justify the monthly cost."
— TrustRadius
Lead with transparent, modular pricing (pay only for what you use), plus a side-by-side ROI calculator and clear scaling costs.
Onboarding/learning curve can slow adoption for non-experts or advanced event/property setups.
"Its initial learning curve can be quite challenging."
— G2
"This complexity at the beginning may deter new users or prolong the time it takes to fully leverage its capabilities."
— G2
Position “time-to-first-dashboard” and guided onboarding: opinionated templates, built-in event governance/naming guardrails, and in-product coaching for advanced concepts.
Some users report identity/data correctness issues and constraints exporting/building custom reports.
"Sometimes due to technical issues, multiple users get created despite identity merge being enabled."
— Capterra
"Limitations on creating custom reports; the Excel sheet cannot fit all data into one sheet."
— Capterra
Differentiate on data reliability + portability: stronger identity resolution controls, automated data QA checks, and “export anything” reporting (CSV/Sheets/warehouse sync) without report limits.
Price can be prohibitive for small businesses / smaller budgets.
"The cost can be a lot higher for small businesses."
— Capterra
Lead with transparent, scalable pricing (clear tiers + predictable usage limits) and provide an easy ROI story (time saved vs. manual instrumentation).
Support responsiveness is a recurring complaint (slow replies).
"Customer support can be slow to respond."
— Capterra
"Support email replies can take too long; faster responses would help."
— Capterra
Differentiate with SLAs (e.g., <2-hour first response), named CSM for paid plans, and proactive onboarding/check-ins to reduce tickets in the first place.
Some users find the UI/reporting less smooth and want better dashboards/charting; initial setup can be hard.
"The backend UI isn’t very smooth and the overall interface can feel inefficient."
— Capterra
"Limited analytics for some use cases; dashboards and charting could be improved."
— Capterra
Position your product as “fast to insight”: polished UX, opinionated templates (activation, funnels, retention), and guided setup that gets teams to a useful dashboard in the first day/week.
Users report it can feel unintuitive and time-consuming to learn, and even “overwhelming.”
"It takes too long to learn to do even basic things. "
— Trustpilot
"It can be a little overwhelming. "
— TrustRadius
Lead with “time-to-value”: emphasize simpler IA/navigation, guided setup wizards, and role-based templates that let teams get value in days—not weeks.
Teams complain about tagging/maintenance effort and needing more automation as the product UI changes.
"It can be a bit tricky to tag up elements when your app evolves frequently. "
— Capterra
"Not have to tag EVERY single little thing. "
— Capterra
Differentiate on “low-maintenance instrumentation”: auto-capture events/elements, stronger governance for changing UIs, and easier debugging/QA for data collection.
Some reviewers explicitly call out price as unreasonable—especially when time is tight and ramp-up is slow.
"Hard to use, unreasonable price. "
— Trustpilot
Compete with transparent packaging and predictable pricing; tie cost to outcomes (activation/adoption) and include onboarding/training that reduces the perceived ‘hidden’ ramp cost.
Perceived as expensive, with value concerns especially for smaller teams/companies.
"Pricing could improve for small companies."
— Capterra
"Very expensive but well worth it."
— TrustRadius
Win deals by leading with transparent, predictable pricing (incl. a strong SMB tier) and a clear ROI story (lower cost-to-scale flags/MAUs/environments).
Seat limits can create collaboration and adoption friction as more engineers need access.
"Limited seats on our plan cause friction."
— G2
"Limited number of seats for engineers has slowed down the adoption."
— TrustRadius
Position unlimited (or high-included) seats, plus lightweight RBAC/auditing so teams can onboard broadly without renegotiating plans.
Teams want better ways to group and organize large numbers of flags.
"One room of improvement could be to group together or categorize flags."
— Capterra
Differentiate with stronger flag hygiene features (folders/tags/ownership, bulk ops, lifecycle policies, automatic stale-flag detection) and show how it reduces operational risk.
High/variable pricing (including overages) with complaints about sharp increases and confusing options.
"Price for minimum package was increased from USD $199 to $899."
— Capterra
"Overages are not well managed by FullStory… we do not need to track 100% of the session data we see via FS."
— TrustRadius
Win with transparent tiers, clear usage caps/alerts, and controls to exclude low-value areas from capture (so customers can predict spend).
Session replay can be slow/unreliable (loading delays or sessions failing to load).
"It takes a few seconds to load the video, so I miss the action I was trying to look at."
— Capterra
"Sometimes it won’t load sessions it seems like this happens when you need it most."
— Capterra
Position on “always-available replay” with faster playback, resilient capture, and clear SLAs on processing/availability.
Replays can be visually misleading due to reconstruction limitations (some UI elements may not render as expected).
"Occasionally, the reconstructed videos of user behavior are misleading."
— Capterra
"Dropdowns don’t always appear as they should… the user zooming-in is also a little disorienting."
— Capterra
Differentiate with higher-fidelity capture (including tricky UI patterns), clearer rendering, and tooling to validate replay accuracy against DOM/events.
Pricing tiers and upgrades are a frequent pain point (perceived forced upgrades / poor value at higher tiers).
"They went from a tool you could use very affordably to penny-pinching every little feature. "
— Trustpilot
"After the product was acquired the price was instantly increased while the pricing tiers became extremely hard to follow… "
— Capterra
Lead with transparent, predictable pricing (especially at higher traffic/volume), and emphasize that core features don’t get paywalled behind frequent upgrade prompts.
Some users question accuracy or report blind spots on complex pages (popups/overlays/checkout), which reduces trust in insights.
"I sometimes question the accuracy of the reports. And if the page has a popup, modal, overlay, etc, that can be problematic. "
— Capterra
"On the checkout page I failed to see customer behavior. "
— Trustpilot
Differentiate on data reliability: highlight stronger masking + SPA/overlay handling, QA tooling, and clear diagnostics to prove what’s captured (and what isn’t).
The review-to-insight workflow can feel heavy (manual setup, lots of recordings to sift through, usability/documentation issues).
"As it stands, you have to set each heat map individually for each page by manually entering the URL and title. "
— G2
"The interfce and the documentation could be made a bit more user-friendly. "
— Trustpilot
Position an “insights-first” workflow: faster setup (auto-discovery), better filtering/segmentation defaults, and guided insights so teams spend less time hunting through recordings.
Perceived as expensive vs. free alternatives, even if the sticker price is “low.”
"The cost, while low, is still higher than the free tools by the tech giants. "
— G2
Position as better value: free tier or cheaper entry plan, plus clearer ROI (e.g., built-in bot filtering + no-cookie compliance included).
Overage/upgrade handling can feel punitive (lost access / forced upgrade), creating “trust” and churn risk.
"Dashboard locked for months after exceeding 10,000 pageviews… paid a year in advance. "
— Capterra
"Asked to upgrade or you’re not allowed into the management environment. "
— Trustpilot
Differentiate with non-punitive overages: never lock dashboards; cap/blur over-limit data, provide alerts, bot/invalid-traffic controls, and self-serve plan changes.
Too “basic” for teams that need deeper journey analysis (e.g., path tracking / deeper dives).
"I do miss path tracking in my analysis. "
— Capterra
"It is super basic—if you’re looking for deeper dives, this is not the software. "
— Capterra
Compete by highlighting advanced analysis (paths/funnels/attribution/segmentation) while staying privacy-friendly (aggregation, cookieless IDs, or first-party modes).
Real customer quotes about competitors of posthog.com
"Speed. UI/UX. Dashboarding. Fast search of properties and how frequently that property is used in queries."
— G2
"Amplitude is a one stop experience for all your analytical needs."
— G2
"I like the ability to create dashboards using existing reports created."
— G2
"Easy to explore and understand user behavior without needing constant support from the data team."
— G2
"I do like the event tracking it’s strong, and I can dive into questions quickly."
— Capterra
"When paired with Segment, Amplitude is great at helping us track user engagement and retention metrics."
— Capterra
"Their free plan is very extensive, so even small teams and startups can use it for free for a long time."
— Trustpilot
"I use Amplitude Analytics to track user behavior in our mobile app specifically within funnels."
— TrustRadius
"It took a long time to load."
— Capterra
"Creating custom reports was complicated and the interface wasn't particularly user-friendly."
— Capterra
"This is not a flexible light weight tool for rapid product feedback on new product launches."
— Capterra
"There's no way for one to do Month to date, week to date time selection."
— Capterra
"No option for custom binning numeric columns."
— G2
"I wish you could query against data uploaded in Amplitude with sql."
— G2
"The documentation has a history of misleading developers in my company."
— G2
"It is the gold standard in this category but comes along with the price tag to support those claims."
— TrustRadius
"Mixpanel focuses on individual user behavior and allows me to track and analyze user interactions at a granular level."
— G2
"Robust tooling that enables you to drill down and obtain certainty about your products."
— G2
"Easy to integrate with backend to pull in events."
— Capterra
"Event tracking and retention analysis empower data-driven decisions."
— Capterra
"Very intuitive; in minutes you can obtain graphs and results without a steep learning curve."
— Capterra
"Great visibility on product usage for both tech and non-technical team members."
— TrustRadius
"Free version lasted me a long time and was great for testing it out."
— TrustRadius
"Rigid pricing. You have to pay for the whole suite even if you only use a fraction of the offerings."
— G2
"Its initial learning curve can be quite challenging."
— G2
"Sometimes due to technical issues, multiple users get created despite identity merge being enabled."
— Capterra
"Limitations on creating custom reports; the Excel sheet cannot fit all data into one sheet."
— Capterra
"The only downside is that there are data privacy concerns."
— Capterra
"There are instances when there are errors in the data that have been gathered."
— Capterra
"Subscription fees for Mixpanel are expensive."
— TrustRadius
"Not convinced it provides enough value over a free analytics provider to justify the monthly cost."
— TrustRadius
"After initial setup, I can log in later, find the event I care about, and see how users are using it—without ongoing engineering work."
— G2
"More valuable than Adobe Analytics; the intuitive UI and dashboards make monitoring and analysis more comfortable."
— G2
"Tracks every user event out of the box, so you don’t need custom labeling and tag maintenance stays low."
— Capterra
"Easy to implement and set up; even non-technical teammates across departments can review the data."
— Capterra
"Clean interface and visually appealing dashboards made it easier to understand the data."
— Capterra
"Robust automated analysis of customer behavior helps teams make the necessary changes."
— TrustRadius
"There is a learning curve, but there are lots of tips, guides, and trainings to get you up to speed."
— TrustRadius
"The cost can be a lot higher for small businesses."
— Capterra
"The backend UI isn’t very smooth and the overall interface can feel inefficient."
— Capterra
"Customer support can be slow to respond."
— Capterra
"Support email replies can take too long; faster responses would help."
— Capterra
"Limited analytics for some use cases; dashboards and charting could be improved."
— Capterra
"It’s easier once setup is complete, but the initial setup can be difficult."
— Capterra
"We use it to monitor feature usage, communicate with our users to support onboarding, and maximize the adoption of new releases. "
— Capterra
"All the analytics are presented on dashboards with organized tables and graphs, and we can easily include them in our presentations. "
— Capterra
"Pendo helped us with user onboarding by pointing out what’s confusing and where users abandon. "
— Capterra
"Enables us to be product led, where we can rely on actual data rather than opinion. "
— TrustRadius
"I utilize Pendo information in my Quarterly Business Reviews to show customers which capabilities they are using. "
— TrustRadius
"Useful for generating dashboards that present user analytics and highlight where users struggle around a workflow. "
— TrustRadius
"Streamlined In-App Guidance & Effective for User Engagement. "
— G2
"Started using Pendo at my current job, and now use it every single day and attend their conferences. "
— G2
"Counterintuitive and inefficient to use. "
— Trustpilot
"It takes too long to learn to do even basic things. "
— Trustpilot
"Hard to use, unreasonable price. "
— Trustpilot
"Analytics side isn’t as robust as the likes of Amplitude. "
— Capterra
"It can be a bit tricky to tag up elements when your app evolves frequently. "
— Capterra
"We had to get into the code and it was a little convoluted and difficult to set up. "
— Capterra
"I wish it had more functionality to see user sessions and not have to tag EVERY single little thing. "
— Capterra
"This makes it a very powerful tool, but it can be a little overwhelming. "
— TrustRadius
"The SDK is top-notch. Adopting LaunchDarkly was easy across the entire stack."
— G2
"Its very straightforward, easy to use, and formatted in a way that makes sense."
— G2
"Having a UI to manage features definitely makes things easier for us."
— G2
"Lets us roll out features to specific clients and filter hundreds of IDs in a segment."
— G2
"Easy to use for developers and friendly, being used in backend, front, and mobile. SDK are nice to use."
— Capterra
"Allowed us to deploy more safely."
— Capterra
"The UI and logic is incredibly easy to navigate and follow."
— Capterra
"LaunchDarkly makes releasing functionality using flags a breeze."
— TrustRadius
"Limited seats on our plan cause friction."
— G2
"Pricing could improve for small companies."
— Capterra
"One room of improvement could be to group together or categorize flags."
— Capterra
"It can be a bit tricky to implement the provider into your React application."
— Capterra
"Limited number of seats for engineers has slowed down the adoption."
— TrustRadius
"Very expensive but well worth it."
— TrustRadius
"Pricing is not well suited for website a/b testing or feature flagging."
— TrustRadius
"Feature to watch how customers navigate your product is a game changer."
— G2
"Fullstory has been the easiest platform to integrate into our complex website tech stack."
— G2
"It is one of the most useful software products I’ve ever encountered for B2B SaaS companies to quickly level up performance 10X."
— Capterra
"Reviewing a list of events is just not adequate, and FullStory solves this problem."
— Capterra
"Once my company got FullStory, I couldn’t imagine a world without it."
— Capterra
"Bug tracking is fantastic."
— Capterra
"FullStory is an essential part of our Marketing and Product tech stack."
— TrustRadius
"I led the FullStory implementation… and brought it to my team at a new company based on my delightful experience."
— TrustRadius
"Price for minimum package was increased from USD $199 to $899."
— Capterra
"Sometimes it won’t load sessions; their support isn’t the greatest; they are ridiculously expensive."
— Capterra
"It takes a few seconds to load the video, so I miss the action I was trying to look at."
— Capterra
"Occasionally, the reconstructed videos of user behavior are misleading."
— Capterra
"Overages are not well managed by FullStory… we do not need to track 100% of the session data we see via FS."
— TrustRadius
"Their pricing is kind of confusing and has increased pretty substantially over the years."
— TrustRadius
"Pricing is pretty high. We’d like to get more sessions but it’s too much $$$."
— TrustRadius
"When I raised a concern… they did not make any adjustments or gave me the old price as a one-time exception."
— Capterra
"Hotjar has increased my understanding about user behavior and given me valuable insights on how to make our site better. "
— G2
"The best thing with Hotjar is that it is super easy to use and you can get started with it in minutes. "
— G2
"Hotjar has a free version that allows you to gain lots of insights on how your visitors are using your website. "
— G2
"The best thing I like about Hotjar is that you can watch the user's behaviour on your website. It captures the video of each user session so you can see exactly where the users click on UI. "
— G2
"The best parts of Hotjar are the intuitive heatmaps, and visitor recordings, that offer deep insights into user behavior and user interaction based on real visitor data. "
— Capterra
"Its seamless integration with other marketing tools provides deep insights into user behavior, allowing you to identify large-scale patterns and continually improve user experience. "
— Capterra
"It gave fairly accurate heat mapping and information regarding user behavior on our website. "
— Capterra
"Provides insights on platform usage. Provides recordings of user sessions. "
— TrustRadius
"Probably the worst product i have used in recent history… it has fallen into the endless in app upgrade cycle. "
— Trustpilot
"They went from a tool you could use very affordably to penny-pinching every little feature. "
— Trustpilot
"The interfce and the documentation could be made a bit more user-friendly. "
— Trustpilot
"On the checkout page I failed to see customer behavior. "
— Trustpilot
"After the product was acquired the price was instantly increased while the pricing tiers became extremely hard to follow… "
— Capterra
"I sometimes question the accuracy of the reports. And if the page has a popup, modal, overlay, etc, that can be problematic. "
— Capterra
"The freemium runs out pretty quickly, and I don't know how accurate the data is (it's hard to verify qualitative data). "
— Capterra
"As it stands, you have to set each heat map individually for each page by manually entering the URL and title. "
— G2
"Fast, lightweight, privacy-first and GDPR-compliant… easy to integrate and powerful once it’s running. "
— G2
"A site monitoring tool not connected to a major tech company that might mine site data. "
— G2
"Cookie-free and EU-based, so my sites don’t necessarily need a cookie wall. "
— Capterra
"We trust the data and don’t worry about cookie blockers… works perfectly right out of the box. "
— Capterra
"Very easy to setup and to use; seeing all your metrics in one page is a breath of fresh air. "
— Capterra
"Great values, privacy-first, high-quality posts, open source and can be self-hosted. "
— Trustpilot
"The app works well… when I emailed support they were super helpful; 10/10 would recommend. "
— Trustpilot
"The cost, while low, is still higher than the free tools by the tech giants. "
— G2
"I do miss path tracking in my analysis (I assume that requires cookies). "
— Capterra
"Not as intuitive as you’d think; sometimes it’s hard to recognize you have certain properties selected. "
— Capterra
"It is super basic—if you’re looking for deeper dives, this is not the software. "
— Capterra
"Dashboard locked for months after exceeding 10,000 pageviews… paid a year in advance. "
— Capterra
"Beware!! Fraudulent “subscription”—asked to upgrade or you’re not allowed into the management environment. "
— Trustpilot
"Extra traffic is from multiple bots, which makes you doubt whether they are scammers. "
— Trustpilot
Social proof elements used by competitors of posthog.com
| Competitor | Case Studies | Testimonials | Customer Claim | Notable Customers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | "~3,000 customers" and "26% of the Fortune 100"; also "more than 2,300 enterprises" and "28 of the Fortune 100". | Ford, Walmart, Atlassian, NBC, Zillow +5 more | |
| — | 5 | Trusted by more than 29,000 companies | Wise , Yelp , Vodafone Oman , Getir , PicPay +5 more | |
| — | — | "Heap is used by over 10,000 companies" (homepage snippet). | H&R Block, DISH, Northwestern Mutual, E*TRADE, Fivetran +5 more | |
| — | — | Join 14,000+ teams building with Pendo. | Demandbase, Cox Automotive, CallRail, Namely, Okta +5 more | |
| 39 | — | Trusted by 5,500+ customers. | Paramount, Christian Dior, Bayer, HP, Ally +5 more | |
| — | — | Over 3,000 companies create data with Fullstory | Chipotle , Pizza Hut , JetBlue , Lowe's , Gap Inc. +5 more | |
| 8 | 4 | Trusted by 1,306,323 websites in 180+ countries. | Invision, Reed.co.uk, HubSpot (HubSpot Academy), Unbounce, Mizzen+Main +5 more | |
| — | — | "Trusted on over 1 million websites in over 190 countries." | Pimcore, MetaLocator, Stockholm University, Climeworks, Concrete CMS +5 more |
Who dominates each topic for competitors of posthog.com
| Category | Leader | Runner Up | Total ETV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Business & Industrial 9 competitors | Amplitude $158,181
ETV | FullStory $110,023
ETV | $346,354 | 30% |
Computers & Consumer Electronics 9 competitors | Amplitude $113,999
ETV | FullStory $43,777
ETV | $246,076 | 62% |
Computers 9 competitors | Amplitude $102,854
ETV | FullStory $43,370
ETV | $226,544 | 58% |
Software 9 competitors | Amplitude $100,928
ETV | FullStory $42,665
ETV | $220,130 | 58% |
Business Management 9 competitors | FullStory $72,303
ETV | Amplitude $39,516
ETV | $164,167 | 45% |
News, Media & Publications 9 competitors | Amplitude $61,117
ETV | FullStory $43,326
ETV | $145,666 | 29% |
Advertising & Marketing 8 competitors | FullStory $69,406
ETV | Amplitude $26,144
ETV | $133,974 | 62% |
Business & Productivity Software 9 competitors | Amplitude $76,382
ETV | FullStory $25,914
ETV | $115,696 | 66% |
Market Research 6 competitors | FullStory $66,459
ETV | Amplitude $18,493
ETV | $99,053 | 72% |
Reference Materials & Resources 5 competitors | Amplitude $46,740
ETV | FullStory $39,159
ETV | $92,997 | 16% |
Scientific Software 1 competitor | Amplitude $60,419
ETV | No runner up | $60,419 | 100% |
Internet Software & Web Goodies 9 competitors | Amplitude $13,802
ETV | Matomo $13,248
ETV | $59,082 | 4% |
Web Stats & Internet Analytics 7 competitors | Matomo $12,738
ETV | Plausible Analytics $12,684
ETV | $53,799 | 0% |
Scientific Equipment & Services 1 competitor | Amplitude $49,809
ETV | No runner up | $49,809 | 100% |
Internet & Telecom 9 competitors | FullStory $8,796
ETV | Hotjar $8,767
ETV | $48,686 | 0% |
Internet 9 competitors | Hotjar $8,482
ETV | FullStory $7,384
ETV | $41,361 | 13% |
Dictionaries 1 competitor | FullStory $37,910
ETV | No runner up | $37,910 | 100% |
Surveys 2 competitors | FullStory $30,470
ETV | Hotjar $5,733
ETV | $36,204 | 81% |
Business Management Software 8 competitors | Amplitude $11,210
ETV | FullStory $9,300
ETV | $28,646 | 17% |
Jobs & Education 5 competitors | Amplitude $12,200
ETV | FullStory $9,034
ETV | $26,193 | 26% |
Finance 2 competitors | Amplitude $23,335
ETV | Matomo $2,798
ETV | $26,133 | 88% |
Arts & Entertainment 8 competitors | Pendo $10,209
ETV | FullStory $5,920
ETV | $25,551 | 42% |
Software Development 5 competitors | Heap $10,758
ETV | LaunchDarkly $3,598
ETV | $18,594 | 67% |
Programming & Developer Software 2 competitors | Heap $10,717
ETV | LaunchDarkly $878
ETV | $11,595 | 92% |
Internet Marketing 3 competitors | Matomo $8,106
ETV | Hotjar $2,022
ETV | $10,723 | 75% |
Java Software 1 competitor | Heap $10,658
ETV | No runner up | $10,658 | 100% |
Business Intelligence Software 3 competitors | Amplitude $7,284
ETV | Mixpanel $1,200
ETV | $8,807 | 84% |
Customer Support & Outreach 1 competitor | Pendo $3,702
ETV | No runner up | $3,702 | 100% |
Law & Government 1 competitor | Matomo $3,677
ETV | No runner up | $3,677 | 100% |
Telephony 5 competitors | FullStory $1,429
ETV | Pendo $670
ETV | $2,941 | 53% |
Search Engine Marketing 2 competitors | Matomo $2,324
ETV | Plausible Analytics $460
ETV | $2,784 | 80% |
Search Engine Optimization 2 competitors | Matomo $2,315
ETV | Plausible Analytics $456
ETV | $2,771 | 80% |
Geographic Reference 1 competitor | LaunchDarkly $2,278
ETV | No runner up | $2,278 | 100% |
Software Testing 1 competitor | LaunchDarkly $1,944
ETV | No runner up | $1,944 | 100% |
Industrial Goods & Manufacturing 2 competitors | LaunchDarkly $1,259
ETV | Mixpanel $670
ETV | $1,929 | 47% |
Business Process Analysis 1 competitor | Pendo $1,512
ETV | No runner up | $1,512 | 100% |
Design & Engineering 1 competitor | Pendo $1,372
ETV | No runner up | $1,372 | 100% |
Health 1 competitor | LaunchDarkly $1,076
ETV | No runner up | $1,076 | 100% |
Search Engines 1 competitor | Plausible Analytics $977
ETV | No runner up | $977 | 100% |
Hobbies & Leisure 1 competitor | LaunchDarkly $840
ETV | No runner up | $840 | 100% |
Web Design & Development 1 competitor | Hotjar $611
ETV | No runner up | $611 | 100% |
Shipping & Packing 1 competitor | Plausible Analytics $203
ETV | No runner up | $203 | 100% |
Keywords driving category dominance for competitors of posthog.com
| Keyword | Competitor | Position | SV | KD | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amplitude | #1 | 73,632 | 63 | $22,496 | |
| cause and effect vs correlation | #1 | 0 | 20 | $10,062 | |
| correlation and causation | #1 | 1,663 | 30 | $10,062 | |
| correlation or causation | #1 | 415 | 30 | $10,062 | |
| correlation vs causation | #1 | 13,018 | 30 | $10,062 | |
| mixpanel | #1 | 18,100 | 44 | $4,182 | |
| quantitative data explanation | #1 | 5,400 | 26 | $1,642 | |
| users id | #1 | 0 | 6 | $1,338 | |
| categorical quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 3 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 13 | $1,338 |
| Keyword | Competitor | Position | SV | KD | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| causation vs correlation | #1 | 6,300 | 12 | $10,062 | |
| correlational vs causal | #1 | 0 | 22 | $10,062 | |
| heap | #2 | 34,242 | 56 | $6,561 | |
| heap app | #1 | 65 | 44 | $3,010 | |
| type of data types | #1 | 0 | 33 | $1,338 | |
| categorical data vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 4 | $1,338 | |
| quantitative versus categorical variables | #1 | 4,400 | 5 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 13 | $1,338 | |
| categorical vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 25 | $1,338 | |
| correlation and causation examples | #1 | 3,600 | 15 | $1,094 |
| Keyword | Competitor | Position | SV | KD | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| causation vs correlation | #1 | 6,300 | 12 | $10,062 | |
| correlational vs causal | #1 | 0 | 22 | $10,062 | |
| heap | #2 | 34,242 | 56 | $6,561 | |
| heap app | #1 | 65 | 44 | $3,010 | |
| type of data types | #1 | 0 | 33 | $1,338 | |
| categorical data vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 4 | $1,338 | |
| quantitative versus categorical variables | #1 | 4,400 | 5 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 13 | $1,338 | |
| categorical vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 25 | $1,338 | |
| correlation and causation examples | #1 | 3,600 | 15 | $1,094 |
| Keyword | Competitor | Position | SV | KD | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| causation vs correlation | #1 | 6,300 | 12 | $10,062 | |
| correlational vs causal | #1 | 0 | 22 | $10,062 | |
| heap | #2 | 34,242 | 56 | $6,561 | |
| heap app | #1 | 65 | 44 | $3,010 | |
| type of data types | #1 | 0 | 33 | $1,338 | |
| categorical data vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 4 | $1,338 | |
| quantitative versus categorical variables | #1 | 4,400 | 5 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 13 | $1,338 | |
| categorical vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 25 | $1,338 | |
| correlation and causation examples | #1 | 3,600 | 15 | $1,094 |
| Keyword | Competitor | Position | SV | KD | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cause and effect vs correlation | #1 | 0 | 20 | $10,062 | |
| mixpanel | #1 | 18,100 | 44 | $4,182 | |
| quantitative data explanation | #1 | 5,400 | 26 | $1,642 | |
| categorical quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 3 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 13 | $1,338 | |
| quantitative vs categorical | #1 | 4,400 | 25 | $1,338 | |
| quantitative vs categorical variables | #1 | 4,400 | 26 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data versus quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 29 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative data vs quantitative | #1 | 4,400 | 29 | $1,338 | |
| qualitative vs quantitative data | #1 | 4,400 | 29 | $1,338 |
+36 more categories in spreadsheet
The highest-traffic pages for competitors of posthog.com
+4 more competitors in spreadsheet
Keywords competitors rank for that posthog.com doesn't
| Keyword | SV | KD | Competitors | Best Pos | Best Competitor | ETV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
causation vs correlation Quick Win | 6,300 | 12 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
cause and effect vs correlation Quick Win | 0 | 20 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
correlational vs causal | 0 | 22 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
correlation and causation | 1,663 | 30 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
correlation or causation | 415 | 30 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
correlation vs causation | 13,018 | 30 | 1 | #1 | $10,062 | |
quantitative data explanation | 5,400 | 26 | 1 | #1 | $1,642 | |
meaning qualitative data | 5,400 | 29 | 1 | #1 | $1,642 | |
meaning of quantitative data | 0 | 32 | 1 | #1 | $1,642 | |
quantitative data meaning | 5,400 | 32 | 1 | #1 | $1,642 | |
users id Quick Win | 0 | 6 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
type of data types | 0 | 33 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical versus quantitative Quick Win | 4,400 | 2 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical quantitative Quick Win | 4,400 | 3 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical data vs quantitative Quick Win | 4,400 | 4 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical or quantitative Quick Win | 4,400 | 4 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative and categorical Quick Win | 4,400 | 4 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative or categorical Quick Win | 0 | 4 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical and quantitative Quick Win | 4,400 | 5 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative versus categorical Quick Win | 4,400 | 5 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative versus categorical variables Quick Win | 4,400 | 5 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
qualitative data vs quantitative data Quick Win | 4,400 | 13 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
categorical vs quantitative | 4,400 | 25 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative vs categorical | 4,400 | 25 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative vs categorical variables | 4,400 | 26 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
qualitative data versus quantitative | 4,400 | 29 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
qualitative data vs quantitative | 4,400 | 29 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
qualitative vs quantitative data | 4,400 | 29 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative data vs qualitative data | 4,400 | 29 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 | |
quantitative data versus qualitative data | 4,400 | 31 | 1 | #1 | $1,338 |
+70 more keywords in spreadsheet
Top-performing Google and Meta ads from competitors of posthog.com. Analyze their messaging angles and creative strategies.
Competitor ads analyzed
40 Google Ads, 0 Meta Ads across 8 competitors.
Top Messaging Angles
Amplitude Product Analytics - Understand Customer Behavior
Understand user behavior to grow your product. Build better products by turning user data into meaningful insights. Explore a live demo.
amplitude.com
Amplitude Product Analytics
Understand user behavior to grow your product.
amplitude.com
Amplitude Product Analytics
Understand user behavior to grow your product.
amplitude.com
Amplitude Digital Analytics
Unlock the Power of Your Products with Amplitude’s Digital Analytics Platform.
www.amplitude.com/
Amplitude Digital Analytics
Unlock the Power of Your Products with Amplitude’s Digital Analytics Platform.
www.amplitude.com/
mixpanel.com
mixpanel.com
mixpanel.com
mixpanel.com
#1 Product Analytics Software - Get Started in 5 Minutes
Mixpanel® Gives You Detailed, Real-Time Insight Into How Users Interact with Products. Track User...
www.mixpanel.com/product/analytics
Get The Why Behind Your Users
Learn why Google Analytics alone isn't enough for your team. Request your free demo now.
www.heap.io/
heap.io
heap.io
5 Metrics For Product Success
Discover the best ways to measure key product areas & the metrics you should avoid.
heap.io
Try Heap Instead
With Heap there is no need to be a data scientist to get actionable insights from data.
www.heap.io/
Pendo.io - Product Experience Solutions
See how companies deliver great product experiences with Pendo Empower users to make...
go.pendo.io/
pendo.io
pendo.io
Pendo.io
Pendo improves the apps you build, buy, and sell so you can deliver better experiences.
go.pendo.io/
pendo.io
launchdarkly.com
launchdarkly.com
launchdarkly.com
Manage Feature Toggles - Get A LaunchDarkly Demo
LaunchDarkly™ Helps Developers Target Users, Roll out Features, & De-Risk Dev Cycles. Create, Organize & Maintain Flags at any Scale. Sign up for a Demo Today!
launchdarkly.com
Feature Flagging as a Service - Get the Free O'Reilly Guide
Deploy when you want, release when you're ready, and enable more product innovation. Adopt feature management practices to deploy every 6 hours instead of every 6 weeks.
www.launchdarkly.com/
fullstory.com
fullstory.com
fullstory.com
fullstory.com
fullstory.com

Hotjar.com™ - offizielle seite
Erlebe vollständige nutzer-transparenz auf deiner website mit Hotjar. Demo buchen.
www.hotjar.com/
Hotjar.com™ - offizielle seite
Erhalte unbezahlbare einblicke in verhalten, bedürfnisse und emotionen der nutzer!
www.hotjar.com/
Hotjar™ website heatmaps
Das all-in-one-tool für UX und marketing teams. Mehr kunden durch eine optimierte website.
hotjar.com
Sitio oficial de Hotjar.com™
Entiende al momento cómo actúan los visitantes en tu web, qué necesitan y qué piensan.
www.hotjar.com/
Digital Experience Analytics
Más de 1.3 millones de webs confían en Hotjar para las analíticas y los datos sobre comportamiento del usuario.
www.hotjar.com/
matomo.org
Try Matomo Free for 21 Days - No Credit Card Required
Get the insights you need with Matomo’s advanced web analytics features. Try it free now.
www.matomo.org/web-analytics
Die beste GA4 Alternative - Einfacher Import von GA Daten
Die nutzerfreundliche und DSGVO-konforme Alternative zu Google Analytics für Ihre Website.
www.matomo.org/
Try It Free For 21 Days - Tired Of Daily Session Limits?
Open-source. Full journey analytics. Privacy-first. 100% accurate data. Dedicated support.
www.matomo.org/
matomo.org
Top-performing landing pages from competitors of posthog.com. Analyze their conversion angles, CTAs, and offers.
Landing pages analyzed
Top 3 landing pages per competitor, selected from longest-running ads.

Angle
An AI analytics platform positioned as giving you an “unfair AI advantage” to learn faster, act faster, and grow by testing everything across the digital journey.
CTA
"Start free in minutes "
Offer
Start free in minutes

Angle
Product analytics focused on turning user behavior into clear next steps “without delays or SQL bottlenecks,” with a unified view of engagement, conversion, and retention.
CTA
"Get Started Free "
Offer
Get Started Free
Angle
Product analytics focused on turning user behavior into clear next steps “without delays or SQL bottlenecks,” with a unified view of engagement, conversion, and retention.
CTA
"Get Started Free "
Offer
Get Started Free

Angle
A digital insights platform promising faster, better insights by giving “complete understanding” of customers’ digital journeys to quickly improve conversion, retention, and customer delight.
CTA
"Free Trial "
Offer
Free Trial

Angle
A product experience + analytics/adoption platform: understand and guide users (across apps/agents) and prove business impact with product analytics, agent analytics, guides, session replay, and more.
CTA
"Get a demo "
Offer
Pendomonium 2026 early bird pricing

Angle
A product experience + analytics/adoption platform: understand and guide users (across apps/agents) and prove business impact with product analytics, agent analytics, guides, session replay, and more.
CTA
"Get a demo "
Offer
Pendomonium 2026 early bird pricing

Angle
A developer-focused platform to “ship with confidence” by combining feature flags with observability, experimentation, analytics, and AI configuration to reduce release risk and outages.
CTA
"Start building free "
Offer
Start building free / Start free trial

Angle
A behavioral data & digital analytics platform promising “better digital experiences” using always-on AI-agent analysts (StoryAI) backed by Fullcapture behavioral data.
CTA
"Get a demo "

Angle
A behavioral data & digital analytics platform promising “better digital experiences” using always-on AI-agent analysts (StoryAI) backed by Fullcapture behavioral data.
CTA
"Get a demo "

Angle
Website behavior analytics positioned as a connected toolkit (heatmaps, session replay, funnels, surveys, user tests) to quickly go from insight to impact; notes Hotjar is now part of Contentsquare.
CTA
"Get started free "
Offer
Get started free (No credit card required)

Angle
A privacy-first Google Analytics alternative emphasizing accuracy (no sampling) and full data ownership/control for web & app analytics.
CTA
"TRY IT FOR FREE "
Offer
21-day free Cloud trial (No credit card required)

Angle
A privacy-first Google Analytics alternative emphasizing accuracy (no sampling) and full data ownership/control for web & app analytics.
CTA
"TRY IT FOR FREE "
Offer
21-day free Cloud trial (No credit card required)
Strategic positioning map for competitors of posthog.com. Visualize where competitors fall on key strategic dimensions.
Competitors mapped
Positioned by product analytics & experimentation depth (low → high) vs enterprise readiness & governance (low → high).
← Product analytics & experimentation depth (low → high) →
Interpretation
Top-right is a red-ocean cluster (Amplitude/Mixpanel/Pendo/LaunchDarkly/FullStory) competing on overlapping enterprise analytics/optimization capabilities. Whitespace sits in bottom-right (powerful self-serve product analytics with simpler governance) and top-left (enterprise-grade, privacy-first analytics positioned primarily on compliance/ownership). Consider differentiating via a clear wedge (e.g., privacy/data control, dev-first workflows, or a narrower use-case) rather than “all-in-one” enterprise parity.
Your next steps based on competitive insights for posthog.com
Position in "Governed & Privacy-First Analytics (Compliance-Led)" — 2 whitespace quadrants vs 1 crowded
Swipe landing page angle from LaunchDarkly: "A developer-focused platform to “ship with confidence” by combining feature flags with observability, experimentation, analytics, and AI configuration to reduce release risk and outages. "